Managed alternative to Uptime Kuma — hosted status page, no server
StillOnline vs Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is popular self-hosted monitoring (open source, MIT). StillOnline is managed — no VPS, plus API/MCP on Pro and RU/EN.
Quick answer
StillOnline vs Uptime Kuma: Kuma is free self-hosted (you run the VPS); StillOnline is hosted — live status page in minutes, $0 / $9 / $29, 1 URL on Free, API/MCP on Pro. Pricing.
Independence
StillOnline publishes this comparison; we sell StillOnline. Uptime Kuma is OSS — see GitHub. Last verified: 2026-06-25.
Best for / Not best for
| Best for | Not best for | |
|---|---|---|
| StillOnline | Managed external probes, MCP on Pro, zero Docker ops | Teams that must keep all data on own metal |
| Uptime Kuma | $0 software, full control, self-host enthusiasts | Founders who value time over VPS savings |
TL;DR
- Choose Uptime Kuma if you must self-host and want full control over data.
- Choose StillOnline if you want external probes, zero maintenance, and agent API from $9/mo.
Quick comparison
| Aspect | StillOnline | Uptime Kuma (GitHub) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Managed SaaS | Self-hosted (your VPS) |
| Software cost | $0 / $9 / $29 | Free (OSS) |
| True cost | Subscription | VPS ~$5–10/mo + your time |
| Status pages | Auto per project | Yes (self-hosted URL) |
| External perspective | Always external | Depends on where you host |
| API / MCP | Pro+ | Community integrations |
| Owner alerts | Email, Telegram, Slack | Discord, Telegram, etc. |
| i18n | EN + RU | Community translations |
What Uptime Kuma does well
- MIT license, no subscription.
- Rich notifications (Discord, Telegram, etc.).
- Full control and customization.
- Active community on GitHub.
Where StillOnline wins
No infra babysitting
No Docker on a VPS that can die with the same outage you’re monitoring.
External checks
Probes run from StillOnline cloud — same path as real users.
MCP for AI workflows
Pro ($9) includes REST + MCP — create monitors from Cursor after deploy.
Bilingual product UI
Russian + English — indie SaaS.
When to choose Uptime Kuma
- Data must stay on your metal.
- You enjoy self-hosting and tinkering.
- Budget is $0 software and you accept ops time.
When to choose StillOnline
- Time > VPS savings for a solo founder.
- You need public status + MCP without maintaining Kuma updates.
Methodology
Compared managed SaaS vs self-hosted OSS for indie SaaS (June 2026). Kuma features from GitHub README 2026-06-25. StillOnline from production plans.
Migration (short)
- Export your monitor URL list from Kuma.
- Create a StillOnline project and add your primary health URL.
- Update public status link to StillOnline; set owner alerts.
- Decommission Kuma on your VPS after a parallel run (optional).
FAQ
Is StillOnline an Uptime Kuma alternative?
Yes for managed uptime + status. No if you require self-hosting.
Which is better for indie SaaS?
Kuma if ops time is cheap; StillOnline if you want external probes + MCP at $9.
Does Kuma have MCP?
Community integrations exist; StillOnline ships stillonline-mcp on Pro.
Can I use StillOnline Free commercially?
Yes.
How do costs compare?
Kuma: $0 software + VPS + time. StillOnline: $0 / $9 / $29 hosted — pricing.
Summarize this comparison in AI
Copy a prompt into ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, or Gemini — with this page and llms-full.txt as context.
