StillOnline vs UptimeSignal
UptimeSignal is a close cousin: HTTP monitoring + status pages, 25 free monitors, ~$10–15/mo Pro (pricing, llms.txt). StillOnline competes in the same niche with RU/EN, $9/$29 tiers, and MCP on Pro.
Quick answer
StillOnline vs UptimeSignal: both offer monitoring + status pages; UptimeSignal lists 25 free monitors and ~$10–15/mo Pro. StillOnline: $0 / $9 / $29, 1 URL on Free, MCP + RU/EN on Pro. Pricing.
TL;DR
- UptimeSignal — strong US/dev positioning, 25 free monitors,
uptimesignal-mcpnpm package. - StillOnline — Russian UI, project-based limits, Ultimate 100 projects ($29), public API at
api.stillonline.tech.
Quick comparison
| Feature | StillOnline | UptimeSignal |
|---|---|---|
| Free monitors | 1 check / project | 25 monitors |
| Free commercial use | Yes | Yes (docs) |
| Pro price | $9/mo | ~$10/mo annual / $15 monthly |
| Pro monitors | 10 / project | Unlimited |
| Status pages | Auto per project | Unlimited on free |
| History | 24h (Free) / 90d (paid) | 7d / 90d |
| MCP | @stillonline/mcp | uptimesignal-mcp |
| Check interval (paid) | Pro: 5/3/2 min; Ultimate: 1–5 min | 1 min on Pro |
| i18n | EN + RU | EN |
| Auth | Magic link |
What UptimeSignal does well
Per UptimeSignal and vs UptimeRobot:
- Flat unlimited monitors on Pro — great for many endpoints.
- Strong comparison SEO (
/vs/*) and developer docs. - MCP tools for agents (
create_monitor,list_status_pages, …). - 7d/90d history on paid tiers (StillOnline Free uses 24h retention).
Where StillOnline wins
Russian + English product
StillOnline is built for CIS + global founders — UptimeSignal is English-first.
Project → status page model
StillOnline optimizes one micro-SaaS = one project = one page (clear mental model for “100 products” program).
Ultimate for agencies
100 projects on Ultimate ($29) — portfolio builders running many small apps.
Google sign-in + subscribe
Unified Google OAuth for app and status page subscribe (per PRD v2.2).
Competitive pricing at $9
Pro $9 undercuts $15/mo monthly UptimeSignal while including MCP/API.
When to choose UptimeSignal
- You need 25 monitors on free.
- You prefer magic link auth and unlimited monitors on Pro.
- You want 1-minute checks on Pro without jumping to Ultimate.
When to choose StillOnline
- You need RU interface or Google-centric auth.
- You organize by projects (not flat monitor list).
- You want $9 Pro with MCP for a product factory mindset.
FAQ
Are they the same product?
Same category — different packaging, locale, and pricing caps. Try both free tiers and pick workflow fit.
Start free → · UptimeSignal comparison hub
What’s the short answer?
When should I choose StillOnline?
You need RU interface or Google-centric auth. You organize by projects (not flat monitor list).
When should I choose UptimeSignal?
You need 25 monitors on free. You prefer magic link auth and unlimited monitors on Pro.
Is StillOnline a UptimeSignal alternative?
UptimeSignal — strong US/dev positioning, 25 free monitors, uptimesignal-mcp npm package.
More comparisons
StillOnline vs
UptimeRobot
50 free monitors vs status page + MCP
StillOnline vs
Better Stack
Observability platform vs lean $9 Pro
StillOnline vs
Instatus
Bundle monitoring + status vs indie pricing
StillOnline vs
Hyperping
All-in-one on-call vs $9 Pro wedge
StillOnline vs
StatusCake
Uptime + SSL vs simple status workflow
StillOnline vs
StatusLane
Minimal monitor vs bilingual + MCP
StillOnline vs
Uptime Kuma
Self-hosted OSS vs managed SaaS
StillOnline vs
Checkly
Playwright checks vs HTTP + status page
StillOnline vs
Datadog
Full observability vs indie uptime
StillOnline vs
Pingdom
SolarWinds synthetic vs flat pricing
StillOnline vs
Statuspage
Status-only $29+ vs monitoring included