Lean monitoring alternative to Hyperping for small teams
StillOnline vs Hyperping
Hyperping markets monitoring + status pages + incident/on-call in one platform. Essentials from $24/mo (annual billing per pricing).
Hyperping tiers and pricing change — the site currently lists $24/mo Essentials; verify on hyperping.io/pricing.
Quick answer
StillOnline vs Hyperping: Hyperping bundles monitoring + status + on-call from ~$24/mo; StillOnline is leaner — $9 Pro with MCP, RU/EN, 1 URL on Free ($0). Pricing · Uptime monitoring · Status pages.
Independence
StillOnline publishes this comparison; we sell StillOnline. Verify Hyperping pricing and limits on their official pricing page. Last verified: 2026-06-25.
Best for / Not best for
| Best for | Not best for | |
|---|---|---|
| StillOnline | Solo indie SaaS needing HTTP uptime + status page + MCP on Pro ($9), RU/EN, flat $9/$29 | Teams that need on-call rotations, 20 free monitors, or bundled incident management |
| Hyperping | Teams wanting monitoring + status + on-call in one stack from $24/mo, 20 monitors on Free | Buyers who only need lean HTTP checks + status without on-call complexity |
TL;DR
- Hyperping — 20 free monitors, on-call/escalation on paid tiers, multi-seat plans.
- StillOnline — lean $9 Pro, MCP, RU/EN — focused on uptime monitoring + status pages, not on-call rotations.
Quick comparison
| Feature | StillOnline | Hyperping (pricing) |
|---|---|---|
| Free monitors | 1 check | 20 monitors |
| Paid entry | $9 Pro | $24/mo Essentials |
| Status pages | 1 per project | 1 (Free), more on Pro |
| Seats | Solo-first | 2+ seats on Essentials |
| MCP | Pro+ — MCP | Integrations (PagerDuty, etc.) |
| i18n | EN + RU | EN |
What Hyperping does well
From Hyperping pricing:
- Free forever: 20 monitors, 5 min interval, 1 status page.
- ROI story vs Pingdom + Statuspage + PagerDuty (~$653/mo stack).
- Essentials $24: 50 monitors, 30s interval, custom domain, on-call policies.
Where StillOnline wins
Lower Pro entry
$9/mo vs $24/mo for founders who don't need on-call rotations yet. See pricing.
AI agent workflow
MCP + REST on Pro — optimized for Cursor-era shipping.
Bilingual
Russian + English — Hyperping is English-first.
No stack replacement pitch needed
StillOnline doesn't require ripping out PagerDuty — it's a narrow wedge for uptime monitoring and status pages.
When to choose Hyperping
- You want on-call + escalation in the same tool.
- You need 20 monitors on free.
When to choose StillOnline
- Solo indie with 1–3 services and a public status link.
- You want MCP on Pro without paying for on-call features you won't use.
Methodology
We compared both products as HTTP uptime + status communication tools for indie SaaS (June 2026). StillOnline limits come from production plan config (Free: 1 project, 1 URL, 5 min interval, 24h history; Pro $9: 10 projects, API/MCP). Hyperping figures come from official pricing as of 2026-06-25. We did not run a 7-day parallel probe benchmark — feature tables reflect published specs, not live SLA measurements.
FAQ
Is StillOnline a Hyperping alternative?
For HTTP uptime + public status page + MCP on Pro, yes. For on-call rotations and escalation policies, Hyperping is the better fit.
Which is cheaper for a solo founder — StillOnline or Hyperping?
StillOnline Pro starts at $9/mo with API/MCP. Hyperping Essentials starts at $24/mo with on-call and multi-seat features — see Hyperping pricing.
Does Hyperping have MCP / AI agent integration?
Hyperping offers third-party integrations (PagerDuty, Slack, etc.) but no dedicated MCP server like StillOnline's on Pro ($9). See MCP docs.
How many free monitors does each tool offer?
Hyperping Free: 20 monitors. StillOnline Free: 1 check per project with an auto status page.
Can I use StillOnline Free for a commercial SaaS?
Yes — Free includes 1 project, 1 check, and a public status page for shipped products.
Summarize this comparison in AI
Copy a prompt into ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, or Gemini — with this page and llms-full.txt as context.
