StillOnline vs Hyperping
Hyperping markets monitoring + status pages + incident/on-call in one platform. Essentials from $24/mo (annual billing per pricing).
Prior Wave 1 note: Hyperping $14–29/mo range — current site shows $24/mo Essentials; always verify hyperping.io/pricing.
TL;DR
- Hyperping — 20 free monitors, on-call/escalation on paid tiers, multi-seat plans.
- StillOnline — lean $9 Pro, MCP, RU/EN, no full on-call suite in v1.
Quick comparison
| Feature | StillOnline | Hyperping |
|---|---|---|
| Free monitors | 1 check | 20 monitors |
| Paid entry | $9 Pro | $24/mo Essentials |
| Status pages | 1 per project | 1 (Free), more on Pro |
| On-call / escalation | Not v1 focus | Included on Essentials+ |
| Seats | Solo-first | 2+ seats on Essentials |
| MCP | Pro+ | Integrations (PagerDuty, etc.) |
What Hyperping does well
From Hyperping pricing:
- Free forever: 20 monitors, 5 min interval, 1 status page.
- ROI story vs Pingdom + Statuspage + PagerDuty (~$653/mo stack).
- Essentials $24: 50 monitors, 30s interval, custom domain, on-call policies.
Where StillOnline wins
Lower Pro entry
$9/mo vs $24/mo for founders who don’t need on-call rotations yet.
AI agent workflow
MCP + REST on Pro — optimized for Cursor-era shipping.
Bilingual
Russian + English — Hyperping is English-first.
No stack replacement pitch needed
StillOnline doesn’t require ripping out PagerDuty — it’s a narrow wedge.
When to choose Hyperping
- You want on-call + escalation in the same tool.
- You need 20 monitors on free.
When to choose StillOnline
- Solo indie with 1–3 services and a public status link.